The article critiques the Daspo law in Italy, which limits the freedoms of specific individuals, primarily the most violent football fans known as 'ultras.' This legislation can impose travel restrictions and stadium bans for up to eight years based on a person's perceived social danger rather than any criminal conviction. The discussion raises concerns about the implications of such measures, likening them to laws in more authoritarian regimes, as mentioned by Giuseppe Conte regarding preventive detentions for certain groups like black blocs.

The article emphasizes that while this law may be seen as a necessary measure to keep the peace in stadiums, ensuring the safety of families and children attending matches, it also imposes significant restrictions on personal freedoms. The author notes that there has been little public debate surrounding the law's legitimacy, suggesting that the general consensus leans toward prioritizing public safety over individual rights. As the discourse around personal freedoms and governmental control continues, this issue remains contentious, particularly in the context of a country where football culture is deeply entrenched.

Overall, the piece advocates for reconsidering the balance between maintaining public order and safeguarding individual liberties. By highlighting the ongoing debate regarding hooliganism, collective punishment, and personal freedoms, it encourages readers to reflect on the social and legal frameworks that govern public events.