The article centers on the ongoing discussions initiated by the Greek Prime Minister regarding constitutional reform, specifically addressing the need for accountability of government ministers for crimes committed while in office. Despite this push, the author expresses skepticism about the possibility of achieving a consensus among political parties, suggesting that the current political climate is characterized by bitterness and resentment rather than cooperation. The article cites the German philosopher Peter Sloterdijk, who posited that the history of western civilization is essentially marked by anger, further emphasizing the difficulties in reaching an agreement on constitutional amendments.

Particularly, the article scrutinizes Article 86 of the Greek Constitution, which grants the parliament the sole authority to initiate criminal prosecution against ministers for crimes committed in the course of their duties. The Prime Minister's proposal to amend this article aims to create a framework where ministers could be held more accountable. However, the author notes that such changes require a significant shift in the political dynamics and the willingness of parties to collaborate, which currently seems unlikely given the prevailing environment of hostility and distrust.

The implications of this proposed amendment are substantial for the Greek political landscape. Should the Prime Minister succeed in fostering a culture of accountability, it could signal a transformative shift in how political leaders are held responsible for their actions. Conversely, the inability to reach a consensus may reinforce existing challenges in governance and public trust, continuing the pattern of anger and blame that characterizes the relationship among political leaders today.