Caregiver receives 600,000 euros from an elderly man with Parkinson's disease, the Court of Cassation: 'Legitimate'
A caregiver was awarded 630,000 euros and a car by an elderly man with Parkinson's, a gesture deemed legitimate by Italy's Supreme Court despite family objections.
Court: Uniform prohibition of success fees for lawyers is not valid; lower court ruling rebuts Supreme Court precedent
A South Korean court ruled that success fee agreements between clients and lawyers based on trial outcomes are valid, contradicting a previous Supreme Court ruling that deemed such agreements invalid.
Victory for Same-Sex Couples in NSA. What Consequences Will It Have for Polish Offices?
The Polish Supreme Administrative Court (NSA) has raised concerns about the country's refusal to recognize and transcribe foreign same-sex marriage certificates, leading to a ruling from the EU Court of Justice supporting these couples' rights.
'A bit of a mixed verdict': Musk misled Twitter shareholders, jury finds
A jury has determined that Elon Musk misled Twitter shareholders regarding a 2018 tweet about taking the company private.
And the dogs from the Franciscano Refuge? PJF determines that the CDMX Government can put them up for adoption
The Federal Judiciary ruled that the Government of Mexico City can proceed with the adoption of 936 dogs previously removed from the Franciscano Refuge.
Two Months Until the Statute of Limitations: Buyer Punished for Protests Against COVID Measures
A court in Zagreb has fined Ivan Pokupec for his role in organizing an unauthorized protest against COVID measures.
Piotr Zamroch: The Judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal in Case P 10/16 from the Perspective of Three Months of (Non)Implementation
The Constitutional Tribunal's ruling on December 2, 2025, has sparked significant debate among distribution and transmission companies in Poland due to its implications on property rights.
2010 ruling by the Supreme Court: the meaning of the term "negras" in the Lithuanian language does not have a derogatory connotation
A significant ruling from Lithuania's Supreme Court clarified that the term "negras" does not carry derogatory implications, despite its use in a racial assault case.
A landmark ruling for same-sex couples in Poland
The European Court of Justice has mandated Poland to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other EU countries, marking a significant legal precedent.
Court: The trunk of the large oak cut down in Mārupe must remain in its place
The Latvian Senate has upheld environmental protection priorities by ruling that the trunk of a cut-down protected oak in Mārupe must stay in place, rejecting a request from the landowner to remove it.
RS hospital is sentenced for illegally charging SUS patients since 2015 and will have to refund amounts in double
The Tribunal de Justiça do Rio Grande do Sul has ruled that Hospital São João must stop illegally charging patients covered by the SUS and return double the amounts collected since 2015.
Cachoeirinha Hospital Still Without Legal Abortion Services, Even After Court Decision
The Cachoeirinha Maternity Hospital in São Paulo has not resumed legal abortion services despite a court ruling mandating their reinstatement.
California’s trans agenda suffers another legal blow after attempt to undercut SCOTUS order fails
A federal appeals court rejected California's bid to narrow a Supreme Court ruling concerning transgender policies, marking another legal setback for the state.
Health prepares new legal measures against Ayuso due to 'obstinate disobedience' in the abortion objectors registry
The Spanish Ministry of Health is preparing legal action against Isabel Díaz Ayuso's government for its refusal to create a registry of conscience objectors to abortion, despite a court ruling mandating such a registry.
$1 million debt: Court to rule on D’Banj’s bid to set aside judgement
A Nigerian court has postponed its ruling on D’Banj's motion to overturn a $1 million judgment against him regarding a failed investment.
With criticism of previous administrations, the Government called the U.S. Justice decision on YPF a "historic milestone"
The Argentine government praised a U.S. court ruling that suspended lawsuits related to YPF, labeling it a 'historic milestone' in a long-standing legal struggle.
Guerrilla Propaganda at Milan Central Station, Increased Crackdown on Lambretta Antagonists
A recent ruling has established that a violent incident occurred at Milan's Central Station during pro-Palestinian protests, leading to legal actions against several activists.
Should it be assessed whether a thirteen-year-old is mature enough to give consent
The Icelandic Supreme Court has annulled a previous ruling regarding a man's conviction for the rape of a thirteen-year-old girl, ordering a reassessment of whether she was capable of giving consent due to her maturity.
The court: Klaipėda council must make a decision regarding the name of S. Nėris Street
A Lithuanian court has ruled that the Klaipėda city council is obligated to implement a decision to remove the name of S. Nėris Street, linked to Soviet ideology, as mandated by a governmental panel.
The Supreme Court requests a reform from the Government to punish the abandonment of persons with physical disabilities
The Supreme Court of Spain has formally requested a legal reform to penalize the abandonment of individuals with physical disabilities, after a ruling that absolved a caregiver from responsibility for neglecting a disabled man.
Africa: Senegal Rejects CAF Verdict, Heads to Court
Senegal's football federation has rejected a ruling from the CAF and plans to take legal action to contest the decision regarding the AFCON 2025 final.
Condominium: everything changes regarding common areas. Swimming pool and tennis courts based on ownership shares
A new ruling from Italy's Cassation Court allows condominium assemblies to decide usage rights of common areas like swimming pools and tennis courts based on ownership shares.
Yoon Suk-yeol's 'life imprisonment' first trial ruling document released... '1206 pages, anonymized'
The full text of the life imprisonment ruling against former President Yoon Suk-yeol has been made public by the Seoul Central District Court.
DF Justice overturns injunction and restores law that transfers public properties to BRB to save the bank
The Judiciary of the Federal District has reinstated a law allowing the government to transfer public properties to the Bank of Brasília (BRB) following a judicial decision.
Mother raped her daughter with a man in Kuopio – Sentences reduced
A Finnish court reduced the sentences of a mother and a man convicted of severe child rape involving the mother's ten-year-old daughter.
Appeal against the ruling of the district court regarding bias as a trustee
The article discusses an appeal against a district court ruling concerning the bias of a trustee in a legal case in Iceland.
The Legal Advisor to the Court: Ben Gvir Violates a Court Ruling, It Should Be Established That a Promotion Can Be Advanced Without His Approval
The Israeli Attorney General asserts that National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir is violating a court ruling by failing to promote police officer Rinat Saban, and seeks court confirmation that her promotion can proceed without his approval.
A precautionary measure halts the agreement for the transfer of labor justice to the City of Buenos Aires
A judge in Argentina has issued a precautionary measure stopping the transfer of labor justice responsibilities from the national government to the City of Buenos Aires, responding to a union complaint.
Church Employment Law: Termination After Leaving the Church Was Illegal
The European Court of Justice ruled that a Caritas employee's job termination following her resignation from the Catholic Church was unjustified, highlighting the evolving legal boundaries of church employment law in Germany.
US judge halts Trump administration's vaccine policy overhaul
A federal court in Massachusetts has halted significant adjustments to vaccine recommendations made by R. F. Kennedy under the Trump administration, sparking legal challenges from major medical organizations.
Hospital resumes services through SUS in Vitória da Conquista after court decision
The Unimec Hospital in Vitória da Conquista has resumed services under the Unified Health System (SUS) following a legal ruling after a two-week suspension.
21-Year Sentence for Kickboxer Who Killed Pregnant Girlfriend
A kickboxer has been sentenced to 21 years in prison for murdering his pregnant girlfriend in Japan.
Five years after the Constitutional Court's decision: controversial provisions of the milk law are applied, raising legality questions
The article discusses the ongoing application of provisions from Lithuania's repealed Milk Law, raising concerns about legality and accountability after a Constitutional Court ruling declared the law unconstitutional in 2020.
Judge Halts Parts of Kennedy's Vaccine Policy
A federal judge in Boston has temporarily halted key aspects of the U.S. vaccine policy changes proposed by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
EDITORIAL: The State is Interested in Our Wallet
The Tallinn Administrative Court has ruled that the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) does not have the right to demand bank account statements from banks without proper legal grounds.
Buyers of claims from the Bierut decree will be left empty-handed. Important resolution of the NSA
The NSA has reaffirmed that buyers of claims related to Warsaw properties cannot be considered parties in the proceedings to establish perpetual usufruct rights, leaving them with little chance to reclaim properties in Warsaw.
Juste Arlauskaitė-Jazzu – unpleasant news from the court
A Lithuanian singer faces a significant legal challenge as the appellate court reviews a previous ruling in her favor.
Validation of the ruling by the judge in Chubut exposed for using AI: 'Here you have point IV reedited, without quotes and ready to copy and paste'
The Chubut Superior Court of Justice upheld a ruling involving the use of artificial intelligence by a judge to draft part of a sentence, stating that such usage does not invalidate a court decision unless there is concrete harm.
Will free animal treatment kill competition? The dispute over charity clinics is ongoing
The Polish National Chamber of Veterinary Surgeons argues that free veterinary treatment offered by charities will put private clinics out of business, a claim highlighted by a recent court ruling.
Judge rejects subpoenas against Powell and points to an attempt to pressure the Fed; Trump government will appeal
A judge has blocked subpoenas in a criminal investigation against Jerome Powell, arguing that the investigation improperly aimed to pressure the Federal Reserve and lacked evidence of wrongdoing.
Court: Central Bank's Revocation of 'Foxpay' License Was Justified
The court upheld the Central Bank's decision to revoke 'Foxpay's license, citing the owner's non-compliance with legal requirements.
Justice acquits councilwoman accused of hitting and killing 85-year-old in Timburi: 'Exclusive fault of the victim', says judge
A judge acquitted a councilwoman of the charge of hitting and killing an elderly man, ruling that the victim was solely responsible for the accident.
Seoul Facilities Corporation Ignores Supreme Court Ruling, Again Rejects 'Call Taxi' Application for Severely Disabled Person
The Seoul Facilities Corporation continues to deny taxi service requests from severely disabled individuals, despite a recent Supreme Court ruling stating otherwise.
LVAT: A person holding Russian and two other citizenships was lawfully denied temporary residence in Lithuania
The Lithuanian Supreme Administrative Court upheld a decision to deny temporary residence to an individual with Russian citizenship, citing national sanctions.
President Yoon: 'How do we change the title of the Prosecutor General in the Constitution?'
President Yoon of South Korea emphasizes gradual legal reforms regarding the Prosecutor's Office during a meeting with ruling party lawmakers.
The CEO spoke nonsense about his income - Here’s what happened
The CEO of 9 Lives Group, Markus Ulfstedt, was convicted of malpractice regarding his reported income and traffic safety hazards.
After Mendonça's decision, Federal Justice wants to make monitoring of conversations in federal prisons mandatory
The Federal Justice is seeking to mandate electronic monitoring of conversations between inmates and their lawyers in federal prisons following a controversial Supreme Court ruling.
Federal Court condemns Caixa and three construction companies for environmental damages in the Mato Grosso Residential in São Luís
The Federal Court in Brazil has found Caixa Econômica Federal and three construction firms liable for environmental damages caused during the construction of the Mato Grosso Residential project in São Luís.
The mayor who has not yet fallen. The help for Lucano
Mimmo Lucano, the former mayor who was declared ineligible due to a criminal conviction, is fighting legal battles to retain his position in Riace despite the court's ruling against him.
Fifty-year-old man filmed sex with a 17-year-old – It was not a crime in itself
A Finnish court ruled that a 54-year-old man did not knowingly commit a crime by filming sexual acts with a 17-year-old girl, as he was unaware of her age during their relationship.